Tactical Trend Trading: Strategies for Surviving and Thriving in Turbulent Markets
Robert Robbins · 2012 · 234 pages
A classic technical-analysis and trend-following playbook: buy sector leaders in confirmed uptrends using measured chart patterns, and protect capital with a hard 1-3% stop per trade. The pattern math is real and useful; the claim that it produces an edge is never tested.
The one idea
Tactical trend trading, as Robbins defines it, means positioning in markets moving in defined trends and staying in cash or short everywhere else. You work top-down: confirm the S&P 500 is in an uptrend or sideways trend, find the two or three sectors showing relative strength (he argues most big winners cluster there), and then hunt for individual stocks or futures markets breaking out of recognizable chart patterns, mostly bases like rectangles, double bottoms, and head-and-shoulders, or continuation patterns like flags, wedges, and triangles.
Each pattern comes with a measured-move target: take the height of the pattern and add it to the breakout point. A rectangle running $1.40 to $1.60 projects a minimum target of $1.80 on breakout ($1.60 - $1.40 = $0.20, then $1.60 + $0.20). Every chart example in the book (Yahoo, Google, Cisco, Amazon, Apple, silver, copper) uses this same arithmetic to set a price target before you're in the trade, which lets you calculate reward-to-risk in advance instead of guessing.
The second half of the book is risk control, and Robbins treats it as more important than the setups. He caps loss on any single trade at 1-3% of total portfolio equity, uses hard stops with no exceptions, and frames the trader's job as staying solvent through a string of 50-60% winners (discretionary) or as low as 30-40% winners (systematic trend following) by keeping losers small and letting the rare large winner run.
What it actually teaches
Robbins lays the process out as a sequence, from confirming market conditions down to sizing the stop on an individual trade:
CONFIRM THE BACKDROP
Before taking any long position, the S&P 500 should be in an uptrend or a sideways trend, not a confirmed downtrend. From there, identify the two or three sectors showing relative strength; Robbins says most large stock winners come from inside these leading groups, not the broad market.
STATE YOUR RULING REASON
Have one simple, sayable reason for the trade, something you could explain to a ten-year-old. Price becomes your objective test: if the reason is proven wrong, you sell immediately and move to the sidelines, no negotiating with the position.
SET REWARD-TO-RISK BEFORE ENTRY
Only take trades with a theoretical reward-to-risk of at least 1:2, and aim for 1:3 or better for most of your trading. His example: a stock in a tight flag from $19 to $20 with a $24 target and a stop just under $19 gives close to 1:4, profitable even at a 50% win rate.
TRADE THE PATTERN'S MEASURED MOVE
Identify a base (rectangle, double bottom/top, head and shoulders, rounding bottom) or a continuation pattern (flag, wedge, triangle), then wait for a volume-confirmed breakout (a rectangle breakout should clear the range by at least 2% on a pickup in volume). Set your price target by adding the pattern's height to the breakout level.
SIZE THE STOP AT 1-3% OF EQUITY
Cap the loss on any single trade at 1-3% of total portfolio value; on a $100,000 account, a 1% stop is $1,000. Robbins also caps aggregate open-position risk at roughly 10% of the portfolio, meaning if every position got stopped out simultaneously, the damage should still be survivable.
RIDE WINNERS, CUT LOSERS WITHOUT EXCEPTION
Raise trailing stops as a trend develops but never loosen an initial stop to give a losing trade more room. Robbins repeats Ed Seykota's rule list from Market Wizards (cut losses, ride winners, keep bets small, follow the rules without question, know when to break the rules) as the summary version of this whole step.
What it looks like Monday morning
A reader would start by screening the S&P sector list for the two or three groups actually showing relative strength this week, rather than scanning individual tickers first. From there, the concrete change is mechanical: before entering anything, calculate the measured-move target off the chart pattern and the dollar stop off account size, and reject any setup where that math doesn't clear roughly 1:2 reward to risk.
The other real change is a hard cap: 1-3% of total equity at risk on any one trade, written down before entry, with no revisiting the stop once it's set. That single rule does more work in this book than any individual chart pattern.
| Drawdown | Gain needed to recover |
|---|---|
| -10% | 11% |
| -20% | 25% |
| -30% | 43% |
| -40% | 67% |
| -50% | 100% |
| -60% | 150% |
| -70% | 233% |
| -80% | 400% |
| -90% | 900% |
Robbins uses this table to justify the 1-3% per-trade stop: the deeper the hole, the more disproportionate the climb back out.
The only true hedge is a sale.Robert Robbins, Tactical Trend Trading
Where it fails
- Every chart example is a winner. The pattern chapter walks through Yahoo, Google, Cisco, Amazon, Apple, Baidu, silver, and copper, and every single measured-move target gets hit, several within days or weeks. There is not one example in the book of a rectangle, flag, or triangle that broke out and then failed to reach its target, which is the far more common outcome for pattern trading. This is straightforward survivorship bias in the case studies.
- The systematic-trading chapter never gives you a system. Chapter 6 promises to explain systematic trend following, then delivers seven questions a system should answer and a list of virtues (unemotional, rules-based, consistent) without a single actual rule, parameter, or entry/exit signal. Robbins says outright that a systematic manager won't reveal his specific rules, which is fair, but it means the chapter title oversells what's inside.
- The trend-following track record cited stops right before a bad decade for the strategy. Table 6-1 shows the BTOP50 managed-futures index averaging 9.5% annually from 1987-2011, used to argue trend following works in both bull and bear markets. The table's own last two rows already show cracks (2009: -4.8%, 2011: -4.3%), and CTAs broadly went on to a rough stretch from roughly 2011 through 2019 that this 2012 book could not have seen coming. A reader relying on that chapter to justify adding managed futures needs to know that stretch happened.
- It assumes a working trader, not a beginner. The book covers gaps, moving averages, and the MACD in a few pages each, as if refreshing a reader's memory rather than teaching from zero. It also assumes you already have capital to size positions with, a real-time data feed, and enough screen time to track sector rotation, futures, and Commitment of Traders data simultaneously. Someone without a trading account or charting software already running will be lost by chapter 3.
- The sentiment and timing indicators stay a black box. Robbins references "proprietary short-term and intermediate-term readings" combining economic, technical, valuation, and sentiment data that supposedly flag market turning points, but he never publishes the formula, the thresholds, or even a rough recipe. Compare this to the pattern chapter, where every rule comes with a real number; the timing layer that's supposed to keep you out of trouble before a top or bottom is described, not given.
Who it is for
Buy it if
You already trade discretionarily and want a clean refresher on classic Edwards-and-Magee-style chart patterns with real measured-move math, plus a blunt, repeatable risk-control framework (1-3% per trade, hard stops, no overrides). The chart-pattern chapter alone is worth the read for that reason.
Skip it if
You're new to trading and need a first course, since the book assumes working knowledge of charts, sizing, and order types. Skip it too if you're hoping for a tested, backtested system with disclosed win rates; the systematic-trading chapter describes what a system should contain without ever handing you one.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. It costs you nothing extra, and it does not change what gets recommended or what the verdict says.